Sabbath Healings and Hard Hearts
By Bev Sedlacek

A Commentary on the Sabbath School Lesson for April 9–15, 2005

Recently, I attended a national business conference held in a city where a dear non-Adventist friend lives. We e-mailed back and forth trying to work out a time to see each other and ultimately discovered that the only time available was Sabbath morning.

I had a decision to make: Would I spend time with my dear friend or attend Sabbath services? I whispered a prayer and e-mailed her that I could not leave the city without seeing her, then I asked when and where could we meet. Of course, the time determined was 11:00 a.m., right when morning services were starting.

On that morning, we greeted each other with hugs and kisses and got caught up on happenings in our lives since we had last seen each other. She apologized for forgetting that we were meeting during my church. I reminded her that Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath.

Our visit was sweet and she thanked me profusely for taking time out of my schedule to see her. She told me that she understood the significance of the time I had "sacrificed." I reminded her that she was precious and that I saw her as my Sabbath blessing. After a season of prayer and long hugs, we departed, agreeing to keep in touch.

I have since reflected upon this encounter, especially in light of events in chapters 2 and 3 of the Gospel of Mark. I did not hesitate to connect with my friend on the Sabbath because as I personalized Mark 2:28: the Sabbath was made for me, and not me for the Sabbath. Enjoying the Sabbath meant spending time with my friend. I even enjoyed a wonderful meal with her. Fellowship and food are important elements in my understanding of the Sabbath. In fact, fellowship, food, and Sabbath have some significant historical ties that provide a framework in which to understand the events of Mark in the grain field.

Tracing the steps of the children of Israel, God sought to restore the sacredness of the Sabbath. He started in the midst of their distress as expressed in Exodus 16. From their perspective, there was no food. In fact, in verse 13, in their distress they said to Moses, "We’re sorry we listened to you and followed you out here to this wilderness!! It would have been better to die by the hand of the Lord in Egypt than to die by starvation out here in this God-forsaken place" (Clear Word). The rest of the chapter tells how God provided meat and bread to the wanderers, and how he connected the collection and storage of manna to the Sabbath.

It is interesting to note that the Pharisees sought to chastise Jesus and his disciples for collecting food on the Sabbath. They did not recall that it was God who had established the sacredness of the day by providing food the way he wanted, and surely he could do so again. Can God be trusted to provide for his children?

As infants, our experience of developing trust occurs when we are hungry, cry, and get the attention of our caregiver, who responds by picking us up and giving us food. We are satisfied and fall asleep, or we play quietly until the cycle starts over again. In the context of this primary relationship, we can be confident of being able to "rest" and know that we will be cared for. In time, we grow up with a foundation of trust carried over into our experience with God. "You made me trust while on my mother’s breast," says Psalms 22:9. This text illustrates the significance of the relationship between food, primary relationships, and Sabbath rest.

"The Sabbath was God’s sign between Him and His people, and evidence of His kindness, mercy, and love" (Ellen White, Manuscript Release, 18:31). Notice the phrase, "between Him and His people." Could it be that the real meaning of Sabbath is about relationships between people and their God? It is no wonder the Pharisees missed the point! From a legalistic perspective, relationship is relegated well below rules and regulations. There is no need to trust among legalists because they know what to do and what not to do based on the rules. However, legalism leads to hardness of heart. In contrast, a soft heart can be worked by the Spirit for moment-by-moment direction, and it can appreciate the kindness, mercy, and love of God.

These two stories—in the wilderness and the grain field—are different sides of the same coin. It appears that God’s provision of food on the Sabbath served only to reveal the hardness of his people’s hearts and their inability to trust. The nature of his pain is summarized in verse 5: "Jesus was hurt as He looked around the congregation because not one of them seemed to know what He was talking about" (Clear Word).

How can we learn from the lessons found in the Gospel of Mark, chapters 2 and 3, culminating in the description of the unpardonable sin (3:28–29)? God is and always will be interested in winning our hearts in relationship—a dynamic one—where we are ever growing in awareness of his kindness, mercy, and love. The Sabbath is reminder of his commitment to that relationship and our keeping of this special time is an agreement that God is all that he says he is.

EMAIL THIS ARTICLE

 

© 2005 Spectrum/AAF

Spectrum and the Association of Adventist Forums depend upon donations to defray the cost of publishing this and other features. Contributions, which in the United States are deductible from taxable income, can be made online at preset amounts, via fax or mail using an order form, or by making telephone contact with the Spectrum office.

 

 

Spectrum Home

AAF | About AAF | Chapters | Calendar | Sponsorship
Spectrum Magazine | About Spectrum | Current Issue | Archives | Authors | Subscribe
Online Community |
Featured Columns | Sabbath School | Reviews | Interactive | Authors
Café Hispano | Artículos Publicados | Escuela Sabática
Store

Feedback | Contact Us

© Copyright 2005 Association of Adventist Forums